![]() |
In a modern plastic recycling facility, one significant capital investment is establishing an advanced plastic film washing line. Your factory may be equipped with the latest crushers, multi-stage friction washers, and sink-float separation tanks. After this complex series of processes, your PE (Polyethylene), LDPE (Low-Density Polyethylene), and PP (Polypropylene) films finally become spotless, free of any dirt, labels, or contaminants. |
But at this point, a critical conflict arises: although these films are clean, they are soaked through.
Lightweight, soft plastic films (such as agricultural film, packaging film, or shopping bags) possess an enormous relative surface area. This physical characteristic makes them absorb and encapsulate moisture like a "sponge." Film fragments just exiting the washing line typically have a moisture content of 10%.
This is the core of the contradiction: If you cannot dry these films to a level acceptable for subsequent processing in an economically efficient and technically reliable manner, all the effort, electricity, and precious water resources consumed in the washing stage will be completely wasted. These wet, fluffy films are virtually "worthless" the moment they enter the Pelletizing Extruder.
Defining the Industry "Bottleneck"
The core of this article is to solve a major business problem: moisture. In the workflow of the entire plastic film washing machine, drying is the most common, most expensive, and most often misunderstood "bottleneck" connecting "clean" and "profitability."
![]() |
The fundamental reason for the problem is not the "water" itself, but the physical form of the "film." Rigid Plastics, such as PET flakes, are hard and granular. Water only adheres to their surface and can be easily removed by physical means. |
However, PE/LDPE films are soft, lightweight, and fluffy. When they tumble in water, they fold onto each other. Water is not just "adhering" to the surface; it is "adsorbed" and "encapsulated" between countless layers of film by surface tension. This trapped water makes relying purely on physical spinning (such as centrifugal force) extremely limited.
We will delve into why traditional drying methods fail miserably, and why a high-tech component—the Plastic Film Squeezer Dryer Machine—is the only key to unlocking the profitability of your entire production line.
Why the Centrifugal Dryer is the Bottleneck in Film Recycling
For decades, the "standard" drying equipment in the plastic recycling industry has been the Centrifugal Dryer (or Spin-Dryer). Its working principle is straightforward: a vertical or horizontal rotor spins at an extremely high speed (e.g., 1,500 RPM), generating powerful centrifugal force to "fling" the water out of the material, which is then discharged through a fine screen.
This method is highly effective in many applications, particularly rigid plastics recycling. Consequently, many factories naturally assume it is applicable for film drying.
Why the Centrifuge Fails Miserably for "Film"
When soft, lightweight, and wet PE film enters the high-speed spinning centrifuge, a catastrophic physical change occurs. They do not tumble freely in the chamber and get spun dry like rigid plastics.
Instead, the powerful centrifugal force "compresses" and "slams" these soft films against the inner wall of the screen, quickly forming a dense, virtually impermeable "filter cake." Even though the machine is spinning at high speed, it is merely "pressing" the majority of the film against the wall, unable to effectively remove the internally trapped moisture.
The final result is that, even after centrifugal drying, the film's final moisture content remains as high as 10%, or even higher in some cases. This is a catastrophic, unacceptable figure for pelletizing.
The False Economy: The Centrifuge + Hot Air Drying Combination
Some centrifugal dryer suppliers may claim their equipment can achieve extremely low moisture levels, such as below 3% or below 2%. However, these figures are often misleading, as they mask a costly truth: this is absolutely not achievable by a single centrifuge alone.
To compensate for the 10% residual moisture left by the centrifuge, traditional production lines are forced to add a second, or even third, drying stage—typically a massive Hot Air Drying System.
This "Centrifuge + Hot Air Drying" combination is a complete "false economy," presenting three unavoidable problems:
-
Extremely High Energy Consumption: Hot air drying is inherently a major energy consumer. Factories must consume massive amounts of electricity or gas simply to "evaporate" the 10% of moisture that the centrifuge failed to remove.
-
Massive Footprint: Pipe Drying Systems are often huge, occupying valuable factory space.
-
Low Operational Efficiency: Fluffy, lightweight films are highly prone to wrapping/tangling and clogging in the hot air pipes.
Therefore, the traditional method forces recyclers to choose between two bad options: either accept the high 10% moisture content (if using only the centrifuge) or endure the energy consumption and high operational costs associated with the "Centrifuge + Hot Air Drying" combination.
How 10% Moisture Fundamentally Destroys Your Profit
Why is 10% moisture so catastrophic? Because this 10% moisture triggers a chain reaction in the next stage of the value chain—the Pelletizing Extruder—fundamentally destroying your final product and production efficiency at both the physical and chemical levels.
When Water Enters the 200℃ Extruder
Imagine a film with 10% humidity being fed into the Pelletizing Extruder's inlet. It rapidly enters the barrel, where the temperature is 200℃ or higher.
Under high heat and pressure, that 10% moisture instantly "Flash-Evaporates," turning from liquid water into high-pressure steam that expands hundreds of times in volume.
Consequence One: Product Quality Disaster (Bubbles and Hydrolysis)
-
Bubbles & Porosity
This high-pressure steam is trapped in the molten plastic and cannot escape. When the molten plastic is extruded through the die head and the pressure is instantly released, the trapped steam violently expands, creating voids inside the cooling plastic.
-
Result: Your final pellet product will be filled with "micro-bubbles" or appear "porous/hollow." These defective pellets sell at extremely low prices on the market, or may even be rejected outright.
-
-
Structural Hydrolysis
Bubbles are only the visible problem; deeper, irreversible damage occurs at the chemical level. Water (H2O) becomes highly aggressive at high temperatures, triggering a chemical reaction called Hydrolysis. Water molecules directly attack and cut the long polymer chains.
-
Result: This chemical degradation will "break down the polymer chain, significantly reducing mechanical strength and durability." This means that even if some pellets look smooth on the surface, their internal structure is damaged. Their tensile strength, impact strength, and overall quality are severely compromised. You are no longer selling high-quality recycled resin, but a low-value "downcycled filler material."
-
Consequence Two: Production Operational Disaster (Clogging and Low Efficiency)
-
Inconsistent Feeding
Wet, fluffy film has an extremely low Bulk Density. The extruder screw is designed to "grab" and convey high-density granules or agglomerates, not light, "wet cotton."
-
Result: "Feeding becomes unstable, leading to low output." The extruder operates in a half-idle state, severely wasting capacity.
-
-
Clogging & Downtime
The burst of moisture and steam leads to "inconsistent melt flow." Water can cause the material to "prematurely solidify" inside the barrel or disrupt the melt flow, leading to "clogging, operational stoppage, and extended processing time."
-
Massive Energy Waste
Finally, your expensive Pelletizing Extruder is forced to play a role it shouldn't: an expensive, inefficient "dryer." Most of the extruder's energy is wasted on "evaporating" that 10%moisture, rather than plastifying the plastic.
Summary: 10%Moisture = Poor quality pellets + Lower output + Higher energy consumption + More downtime. This is a complete commercial disaster.
Solution: Plastic Film Squeezer Dryer Machine
Clarifying Industry Terminology
![]() |
To truly understand the revolutionary nature of this technology, we must first clarify the industry terminology. These terms are often used interchangeably, but they describe different aspects of the machine’s collaborative function:
|
Key Difference: Why the Squeezer is Not a Centrifuge
The distinction between these two technologies is fundamental. The Centrifuge attempts "Fling-Drying" water. The Squeezer performs "Wring-Drying" water. It utilizes pure, powerful Mechanical Compression, achieving tremendous success with film.
Mechanical Principle: How the Squeezer Dryer Achieves <5%Moisture
Stage 1: Powerful Mechanical Squeezing
|
|
|
Stage 2: Frictional Heat & Semi-Plasticizing
Merely "squeezing" removes most of the moisture, but the "secret weapon" of the squeezer dryer occurs at the end of the screw. This is not just dewatering, but material transformation.
-
Frictional Heat: When the plastic is subjected to extreme pressure at the end of the screw (some advanced models even use a Hydraulic Lock to increase back pressure), the intense friction between the material particles and between the material and the barrel wall generates significant heat.
-
Semi-Plasticizing: This controlled Frictional Heat is sufficient to make the surface of PE/LDPE films (which have relatively low melting points) "slightly melt" or reach a "Semi-Plasticized" state.
This "semi-plasticizing" process is key to achieving ultimate dryness and efficient pelletizing, serving two indispensable roles:
-
Final Drying: This heat will "flash-evaporate" any remaining, capillary-trapped water into steam, which is then discharged.
-
Material Densification: It transforms the originally light, fluffy, low-Bulk Density film flakes into heavier, dense, pellet-like "Clumps" or "Irregular Granules."
Output: Perfect Material Ready for Direct Pelletizing
|
The material discharged from the squeezer dryer is no longer "dried film," but a new, ideal feed for the extruder:
|
Squeezer Dryer (Squeezer) VS. Centrifugal Drying (Centrifugal)
For any plastics recycling plant operations manager or owner, choosing the correct drying technology is the decisive factor in achieving profitability. The comparison table below clearly summarizes this technological confrontation.
| Feature | Conventional Centrifugal Dryer | Boxin Squeezer Dryer |
| Working Principle | Centrifugal Force (G-force) | Mechanical Screw Press + Frictional Heat |
| Efficiency for Film | Moderate. Film compression leads to moisture retention. | Extremely High. Physical squeezing and thermal evaporation. |
| Final Moisture (Standalone) | sim 10% or higher | < 5%, typically 1-3% |
| Output Form | Wet, fluffy, low-bulk density film flakes | Dry, dense, semi-plasticized clumps/granules |
| Compatibility with Pelletizer | Moderate. Leads to inconsistent feeding, bubbles, porosity. | Perfect. Can be directly and stably fed as high-density material. |

EN
English
简体中文
Русский
España
عرب .

